0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4
#62
RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4
oh yeah...................F#CK the viper, cmon 20 valves??????? We have this thing called technology. VW 4 cylinders have as many valves.
#65
RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4
I just cant respect a Viper anymore after I saw a N/A Miata, thats right I said Miata hand one his @$$ on the auto-X coaurse
Plus the new ones look too much like the new vettes, cant anyone create nything different anymore
Plus the new ones look too much like the new vettes, cant anyone create nything different anymore
#69
RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4
ORIGINAL: sacicons
dont kid yourself. the lasers were mitsubishis.
dont kid yourself. the lasers were mitsubishis.
actually we were both wrong (see link), but i was closer, heh heh. the laser was plymouth's, which shared the same platform with the eclipse in 1992 until eagle took over platform sharing in the next generation with the talon. dodge's version was called the daytona and it shared platforms with the laser before mitsubishi in the previous generation. the laser sported a turbo and pushed around 195 hp @ 6000 rpm in 1992. mitubishi also shared the 3000 gt platform with chrysler as the dodge stealth amongst other numerous shared platforms between chrysler and mitsubishi.
#70
RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4
sorry sacicons, i just realized what you were saying its 6 am and i need to go to bed. ok you were saying the laser was mitu's technology right? so dodge cant claim any credit for it? heh heh, went over my head there. anyway i would agree on the eclipse platform. but the dodge daytona was on a completely different platform and i believe on a dodge designed drive train. it too was turboed but pushed 224 hp @ 6000 rpm.