Pics and Videos Post Video and Sound clips here. This forum is for video's pertaining to Honda Civic's, Racing (Street/Strip), Interviews, and Off Topic.

0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #61  
Old 05-02-2005, 01:01 AM
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,049
Default RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4

Probably somewhere around $8,500 not counting the car. That will jump when I start working on suspension and the like.
 
  #62  
Old 05-02-2005, 09:53 PM
sacicons's Avatar
HCF Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,699
Default RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4

oh yeah...................F#CK the viper, cmon 20 valves??????? We have this thing called technology. VW 4 cylinders have as many valves.
new Viper has 40 valves[sm=badbadbad.gif] and i like the idea of the civic, but the used SRT would own it in DRAG racing.
 
  #63  
Old 05-03-2005, 06:02 AM
Kappa22's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location:
Posts: 3,095
Default RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4

The Viper is a good example of why American cars are still incredibly inferior to Japanese and European cars.

And as for the SRT-4... tsk tsk, gentlemen.

 
  #64  
Old 05-03-2005, 08:15 AM
315 Customs's Avatar
Administrator - Formerly 90Civtegra
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Glen Burnie, Maryland
Posts: 2,549
Default RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4

why is this in sights and sounds?
 
  #65  
Old 05-03-2005, 10:24 AM
LEVIII's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location:
Posts: 2,448
Default RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4

I just cant respect a Viper anymore after I saw a N/A Miata, thats right I said Miata hand one his @$$ on the auto-X coaurse



Plus the new ones look too much like the new vettes, cant anyone create nything different anymore
 
  #66  
Old 07-04-2005, 05:30 AM
elfreaky70363's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location:
Posts: 446
Default RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4

some of the lasers had turbos
 
  #67  
Old 07-04-2005, 12:37 PM
sacicons's Avatar
HCF Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,699
Default RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4

dont kid yourself. the lasers were mitsubishis.
 
  #68  
Old 07-04-2005, 01:36 PM
LEVIII's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location:
Posts: 2,448
Default RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4

sure glad to see this thread back, lol
 
  #69  
Old 07-05-2005, 06:08 AM
elfreaky70363's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location:
Posts: 446
Default RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4


ORIGINAL: sacicons

dont kid yourself. the lasers were mitsubishis.
http://www.edmunds.com/used/1992/ply...v..6.Plymouth*

actually we were both wrong (see link), but i was closer, heh heh. the laser was plymouth's, which shared the same platform with the eclipse in 1992 until eagle took over platform sharing in the next generation with the talon. dodge's version was called the daytona and it shared platforms with the laser before mitsubishi in the previous generation. the laser sported a turbo and pushed around 195 hp @ 6000 rpm in 1992. mitubishi also shared the 3000 gt platform with chrysler as the dodge stealth amongst other numerous shared platforms between chrysler and mitsubishi.
 
  #70  
Old 07-05-2005, 06:10 AM
elfreaky70363's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location:
Posts: 446
Default RE: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4

sorry sacicons, i just realized what you were saying its 6 am and i need to go to bed. ok you were saying the laser was mitu's technology right? so dodge cant claim any credit for it? heh heh, went over my head there. anyway i would agree on the eclipse platform. but the dodge daytona was on a completely different platform and i believe on a dodge designed drive train. it too was turboed but pushed 224 hp @ 6000 rpm.
 


Quick Reply: 0-60 VTEC vs. SRT-4



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:55 PM.