sorry for the fed up sig
#23
RE: sorry for the fed up sig
ORIGINAL: hondasav
you know what there remmy i am sorry to say but i am sure it would take more then half the civics here sadly.
you know what there remmy i am sorry to say but i am sure it would take more then half the civics here sadly.
Im more than postivie that will take most civics here and there is nothing sad about it. But I dont understand how you would need a wing that big for rally. For the record I was not knocking your car. I do however find it a bit silly looking. But its your ride, not mine.
#24
RE: sorry for the fed up sig
ORIGINAL: Forty04
NEW?! Are you insane? Idiots have been ricing their cars out for YEARS now.
Whats that turd run in the 1/4 mile?
ORIGINAL: hondasav
exactley I built it to be different. I wanted something new,
exactley I built it to be different. I wanted something new,
Whats that turd run in the 1/4 mile?
I haven't taken it to the quater mile. I usually run it on mosprt in oshawa.
how about your burning red paper bag of poo.
#25
RE: sorry for the fed up sig
yes new... It is fully functional. And I am sorry I didn't jump on the band wagon of boosting a civic.. which I think is a pretty dumb idea. And I don't really think that I would call this rice... unlike most dumb *** kids with civics, that put there corny *** huge plastic kits on the font.. which they pay a fortune for.. and all they did was put 10 screws in to put it on... when its not even painted stuipid people.. I built that entire kit from fibreglass, along with the rear wing. which more then 3/4 of the people of this forum couldn't do if there life depended on it.
I haven't taken it to the quater mile. I usually run it on mosprt in oshawa.
how about your burning red paper bag of poo.
I haven't taken it to the quater mile. I usually run it on mosprt in oshawa.
how about your burning red paper bag of poo.
im now offended....
#26
RE: sorry for the fed up sig
you call my car a "turd" i call yours a flaming red bag of poo. just his.
I sound like the biggest honda hater but I not. I am a dedicated honda person all my parents drive hondas I have one. My first car was a 90 si. I just wanted to build something that you don't see every day.
I sound like the biggest honda hater but I not. I am a dedicated honda person all my parents drive hondas I have one. My first car was a 90 si. I just wanted to build something that you don't see every day.
#27
RE: sorry for the fed up sig
Let me start by saying Welcome to a HONDA CIVIC FORUM! If you don't like civics, why are you here? There are plenty of forums filled with wannabe Cosworth drivers that I'm sure would love the glorious craftsmanship that went into the design of your car.. Seriously, try showing them those pictures, and see what they think. Maybe they’ll be able to find this genius ingenuity you speak of.
Let's start with Aerodynamics, as this is a fairly big part of rally racecar design, but you already knew that, hence the wing. But, if you'd really taken aerodynamics seriously, or even knew the first thing about it, you wouldn't have produced the monstrosity that graces the front end of your car. Not to mention, you rag on Civics with body kits for only using 10 screws to hold them on? This method is obviously no match for the hundreds of rivets you’ve used to attach that ****ing snow plow you call a front bumper.
Now, let’s move on to that wing of yours. How much R&D went into the design of that thing? Looks to me like the car already had a wing on it, but this was obviously not good enough for someone with your driving abilities. I’m sure the new park bench has improved the cornering abilities, and keeps that blistering 150whp firmly planted to the ground. Nice work, really, it looks FANTASTIC.
Seems like the motor in that thing is just as efficient as the ridiculous exterior. I mean really, a stock boosted 2.3L SOHC that throws out a WHOPPING 175 crank hp, and gets a whole 18mpg is really impressive…REALLY.
One more thing… I think you’re completely right, boosted a Civic is totally bandwagon and stupid. I mean what kind of dumb asses take a tiny 1.6L, with 9:1 compression, throw a small turbo on it, and nearly double the horsepower…. reliably? That IS stupid. Oh yeah, and I still get 40mpg+ on the highway, I must be a complete ****ing idiot.
In conclusion, the next time you’re just sitting around, enjoying the fact that your life is so pointless, that trolling forums to cause trouble sounds like fun, be sure to know what the **** you’re talking about before starting e-fights. Keep this **** up, and we’ll just ban you, it’s really no big deal. Forum rules clearly state that bashing cars, which the forum is based on, is uncalled for, and grounds for banning. Be thankful we’ve allowed you to stay this long. I hope you enjoy the rest of your stay here at HCF, and can learn to appreciate the hardwork and determination the members have put forth towards making “stupid little rice cars” go fast, handle well, and slaughter “real fast cars.”
p.s., learn to take sarcasm, I even call my own car a turd.
Let's start with Aerodynamics, as this is a fairly big part of rally racecar design, but you already knew that, hence the wing. But, if you'd really taken aerodynamics seriously, or even knew the first thing about it, you wouldn't have produced the monstrosity that graces the front end of your car. Not to mention, you rag on Civics with body kits for only using 10 screws to hold them on? This method is obviously no match for the hundreds of rivets you’ve used to attach that ****ing snow plow you call a front bumper.
Now, let’s move on to that wing of yours. How much R&D went into the design of that thing? Looks to me like the car already had a wing on it, but this was obviously not good enough for someone with your driving abilities. I’m sure the new park bench has improved the cornering abilities, and keeps that blistering 150whp firmly planted to the ground. Nice work, really, it looks FANTASTIC.
Seems like the motor in that thing is just as efficient as the ridiculous exterior. I mean really, a stock boosted 2.3L SOHC that throws out a WHOPPING 175 crank hp, and gets a whole 18mpg is really impressive…REALLY.
One more thing… I think you’re completely right, boosted a Civic is totally bandwagon and stupid. I mean what kind of dumb asses take a tiny 1.6L, with 9:1 compression, throw a small turbo on it, and nearly double the horsepower…. reliably? That IS stupid. Oh yeah, and I still get 40mpg+ on the highway, I must be a complete ****ing idiot.
In conclusion, the next time you’re just sitting around, enjoying the fact that your life is so pointless, that trolling forums to cause trouble sounds like fun, be sure to know what the **** you’re talking about before starting e-fights. Keep this **** up, and we’ll just ban you, it’s really no big deal. Forum rules clearly state that bashing cars, which the forum is based on, is uncalled for, and grounds for banning. Be thankful we’ve allowed you to stay this long. I hope you enjoy the rest of your stay here at HCF, and can learn to appreciate the hardwork and determination the members have put forth towards making “stupid little rice cars” go fast, handle well, and slaughter “real fast cars.”
p.s., learn to take sarcasm, I even call my own car a turd.
#30
RE: sorry for the fed up sig
ok I will admit i was owned there lol.
not starting anything but... its not stocklol , bored, port polished, 3 angle valve, 18 psi of boost.
And i know the car is not the greatest thing to look at.. its just the effort that I put into it.
And you car is pretty sick. b16a or d16. I show that car some respect cause you didn't go with a huge body kit or anything, I definatley would not expect to it going flying past me.
Truse man.
peace
not starting anything but... its not stocklol , bored, port polished, 3 angle valve, 18 psi of boost.
And i know the car is not the greatest thing to look at.. its just the effort that I put into it.
And you car is pretty sick. b16a or d16. I show that car some respect cause you didn't go with a huge body kit or anything, I definatley would not expect to it going flying past me.
Truse man.
peace