Psycho ex-husband destroys M3.
#12
11-02-2005 | 01:41 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,414
From:
RE: Psycho ex-husband destroys M3.
ORIGINAL: Mossy
do you think there would be any way to prove the ex-husband did it so he could file a lawsuit and get some money?
do you think there would be any way to prove the ex-husband did it so he could file a lawsuit and get some money?
#13
11-02-2005 | 01:49 AM
HCF Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,168
From: Jersey
RE: Psycho ex-husband destroys M3.
Not true. Its called Circumstancual Evidence.
Ex. You go to sleep at nite, when you wake up the next day there is snow on the ground. You didnt see it happen, but you know it did.
Granted this situation is much much different, but that type of damage is not conducted by a neutral party. Take it to court with a lawyer who knows his stuff, you wont leave completly empty handed.
Ex. You go to sleep at nite, when you wake up the next day there is snow on the ground. You didnt see it happen, but you know it did.
Granted this situation is much much different, but that type of damage is not conducted by a neutral party. Take it to court with a lawyer who knows his stuff, you wont leave completly empty handed.
#14
11-02-2005 | 01:57 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,414
From:
RE: Psycho ex-husband destroys M3.
ORIGINAL: pcupo12
Ex. You go to sleep at nite, when you wake up the next day there is snow on the ground. You didnt see it happen, but you know it did.
Ex. You go to sleep at nite, when you wake up the next day there is snow on the ground. You didnt see it happen, but you know it did.
In other words, the owner could be mistaken, and say that he knows pcupo12 did the damage, but do you think they'll charge you? No, they can't charge you, but they'll ask you questions hoping that you'll screw up and give them some evidence. In other words, if you keep denying it and say nothing else, they can't prove sh*t.
#15
11-02-2005 | 01:59 AM
HCF Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,168
From: Jersey
RE: Psycho ex-husband destroys M3.
Well Sort of. You see, the fact that there is circumatantual evidence gives the po-po the probably cause they need to do an in-depth investigation. They will want to know where the suspect was when the criminal mischief happend, who he was with and how he can prove he was there. Theyll get em.
#16
11-02-2005 | 02:01 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,414
From:
RE: Psycho ex-husband destroys M3.
ORIGINAL: pcupo12
Well Sort of. You see, the fact that there is circumatantual evidence gives the po-po the probably cause they need to do an in-depth investigation. They will want to know where the suspect was when the criminal mischief happend, who he was with and how he can prove he was there. Theyll get em.
Well Sort of. You see, the fact that there is circumatantual evidence gives the po-po the probably cause they need to do an in-depth investigation. They will want to know where the suspect was when the criminal mischief happend, who he was with and how he can prove he was there. Theyll get em.
#17
11-02-2005 | 02:04 AM
HCF Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,168
From: Jersey
RE: Psycho ex-husband destroys M3.
The police can go as far as requiring documented evidence of his whereabouts during the time of the crime. This isnt the sort of crime that would be taken lightly. Judging by the sound of the dude, im SURE hes got a nice wrap sheet, which wont help him either. The cops will be able to crack it.
#19
11-02-2005 | 06:43 AM
Laced with Sarcasm
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 15,280
RE: Psycho ex-husband destroys M3.
All it would take is one spot of paint on the guy, or the guys car to prove his guilt. But the looks of it, i would say that he probably got a little on himself during this little endeavor.
But, I'd skip the courts, and slit his ****ing throat
But, I'd skip the courts, and slit his ****ing throat
