The Lounge This section is for the most off topic of OT posts. although the lounge is moderated, whoring is permitted.

No replacment for displacement?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #61  
Old 03-30-2006 | 08:33 AM
sacicons's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,699
Default RE: No replacment for displacement?

Sacs you can not say the hell with tq, all hp is is a formula equated from tq.
Yeah, but torque doesnt do anything. Its a measurment of force being exerted on something. you can put 250,000 lb-ft of torque against the side of a moutain, and not a damn thing will move. but if you put a 2hp briggs and stratton with a big drill on the end, it will start moving that mountain, a little at a time. you HAVE to move something with torque to get anything done, and as soon as it moves, it becomes horsepower. so the torque is only there as a factor of HP. and I still stand by the fact that its a not-true superlative. If it was true, then like Levi said, the fastest vehicles on the road would be big-rigs. because they displace the most.

and the 8.3L Viper makes 505hp.
the 6.0L Enzo makes 660hp. and Im having a hard time seeing the turbos on it.

and even if it were turbo, the Henessey Viper of old made 733to the flywheel with twin turbos on what? 8L?
 
  #62  
Old 03-30-2006 | 08:40 AM
Patrick's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,358
Default RE: No replacment for displacement?

if i may, hennessey is the joke of the viper world...

SVS (super viper systems) has what is currently the fastest V10 powered viper..it is twin turbo, and dyno'd over 2000hp..and ive seen it run in person, in the low 8s...also, they are surprisingly chatty...i posted a bunch of videos in the video section when aruging with marty about GM versus dodge...

i know that these pictures arent great, but the stryker logo gives you an idea of what the car looks like, and the other is a shot of the turbos...i have a better picture, i just cant find it right now.

[IMG]local://upfiles/858/AFCFAEF0A3DE49C69ADC296A45E1167C.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/858/94BBBA05B57C4F5A944550701E5E9051.jpg[/IMG]

also, underground racing dyno'd their viper (i believe that theirs is Roe supercharged) to around 1300hp...
 
  #63  
Old 03-30-2006 | 08:47 AM
Patrick's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,358
Default RE: No replacment for displacement?

sorry for the double post, but i found a video...the guy walking around is the guy who i talked to..i believe that he is the crew chief...


http://www.svspower.com/images/upload/video_54_0.wmv


watching this thing launch is unreal...i dont have a race video of it, but i believe that they broke into the 7s at norwalk last year in the mod-viper class.
 
  #64  
Old 03-30-2006 | 11:28 AM
andryuha's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,639
From: Parma, OH
Default RE: No replacment for displacement?

ORIGINAL: Marty

All being the same as far as chassis, weight, and other things displacement owns I am sorry. Take this into consideration. A V10 from a Viper makes like 550hp and is a 8.3 liter engine. For Ferrari to make 700hp with a Enzo with a smaller displacement V12 they had to strap 2 turbo's to it. I am not saying a Viper is better than a Enzo so please dont break off into that. I am just saying all being on level playing ground, 2 engines ment to do the same thing, setup the same way, the bigger displacement engine will make more hp and more importantly more tq. Sacs you can not say the hell with tq, all hp is is a formula equated from tq.
meh, compare the viper v10 to this one http://www.bmwworld.com/models/m5_e60.htm
 
  #65  
Old 03-30-2006 | 11:34 AM
Patrick's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,358
Default RE: No replacment for displacement?

sexiest car EVER.

[IMG]local://upfiles/858/C5F9D4EF10544AEBA2F1CA627F1873E2.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/858/CD961048C9D146489EEB6790DBBC9E05.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/858/386F8374BA9E4D348982DC27C1815EF4.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/858/9CDF5A6594E04617BEF4636185481100.jpg[/IMG]

[IMG]local://upfiles/858/44312ECF670B44EF963A62039BB90534.jpg[/IMG]
 
  #66  
Old 03-30-2006 | 11:40 AM
andryuha's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,639
From: Parma, OH
Default RE: No replacment for displacement?

^^^ you may like this vid then http://www.bmwusa.com/vehicles/futur...ewM6/video.htm

My personal favorite BMW is E39 M5 though.
 
  #67  
Old 03-30-2006 | 11:46 AM
andryuha's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,639
From: Parma, OH
Default RE: No replacment for displacement?

ORIGINAL: sacicons

[and the 8.3L Viper makes 505hp.
the 6.0L Enzo makes 660hp. and Im having a hard time seeing the turbos on it.

and even if it were turbo, the Henessey Viper of old made 733to the flywheel with twin turbos on what? 8L?
It would be a sacrreligious for Ferrari to use FI on their cars. Ferrari makes relatively low displacement engines that produce awesome N/A power and reve very high.
 
  #68  
Old 03-30-2006 | 11:51 AM
Marty's Avatar
HCF Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,519
From: South Central
Default RE: No replacment for displacement?

Ok here is a easy comparo

a 357ci gm small block(GTO) vs a 427ci(Z06)

Same block, same idea's, same stroke. The LS7 owns it simply put. Once again GM.....4.3 V6 vs a 3.8 V6, the 4300 wins. Ok Honda, R18(new base model civic engine) vs D16 the R18 puts out around 12 more hp but with about 20 more ft lbs of tq.

I am going to leave this thread simply because there is allways an exception like a high priced , low production model but on a whole a engine with larger displacement has more potentail no if's, and's, or but's about it. I mean you look at the whole concept of a combustion engine and you can tell that,. A engine = a air pump, there for a engine that can displace more air has the ability to do more.
 
  #69  
Old 03-30-2006 | 11:56 AM
Patrick's Avatar
Administrator
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,358
Default RE: No replacment for displacement?

hmmm..i may also prefer the E39 M5, but the new M6 is simply awesome...

I know that the M6 at the NAIAS was open to poke around in when i was there, but that was on a industry day...was it also open for public days? Oddly, one thing that i dont care for on the M6 is the carbon fiber roof...

and as marty said, there is always an exception...technically, battle ships prove 100% that there is no replacement for displacement, as their engines are bigger than any of our houses, and have tremendous amounts of power...but, i know that alot of ships use forced induction as well...

in the end, fast is fast, no matter what youre driving.
 
  #70  
Old 03-30-2006 | 01:32 PM
Kappa22's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,095
From:
Default RE: No replacment for displacement?


ORIGINAL: Marty
Sacs you can not say the hell with tq, all hp is is a formula equated from tq.
...and engine speed. Don't forget about that. Even with low torque numbers, high engine speeds will allow an engine to do identical amounts of work (remember, that's what horsepower is referring to, as sacs said).

Horsepower = (torque x rpms)/5252
 


Quick Reply: No replacment for displacement?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:25 AM.