The Lounge This section is for the most off topic of OT posts. although the lounge is moderated, whoring is permitted.

If you had the money....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 12-19-2008, 07:08 PM
Civic|UnLimiteD's Avatar
HCF Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 456
Default

or how about the CADDILAC CTS-V TAKES THE COMPETITION!
 
  #22  
Old 12-19-2008, 07:16 PM
Civic|UnLimiteD's Avatar
HCF Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 456
Default

its quicker than the M5
 
  #23  
Old 12-19-2008, 07:24 PM
ej6buddy's Avatar
HCF Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,794
Default

When Twin-Turbo'd Power just isn't Good Enough.....

 
  #24  
Old 12-19-2008, 08:53 PM
Sigracer10's Avatar
HCF Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,184
Default

Absolutely!!!!


Originally Posted by ej6buddy
when twin-turbo'd power just isn't good enough.....

 
  #25  
Old 12-20-2008, 06:51 AM
sdillinger's Avatar
HCF Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Northwest Indiana
Posts: 28
Default

Fun thread. In all honesty if I won a few $million tomorrow, I would completely restore my GSR, trade the wife's civic for the newest, lowest mileage RSX type S I could find, and fully restore an 80's K5 blazer for my winter ride, since Ive ALWAYS wanted one since I knew what a truck was.

Name:  24441DSCN1570.jpg
Views: 23
Size:  63.2 KB
 
  #26  
Old 12-20-2008, 07:31 AM
reaper2022's Avatar
Super Cereal Admin
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 7,081
Default

Originally Posted by Civic|UnLimiteD
its quicker than the M5
And I'm sure cadillac's 4,250-lb behemoth of a car handles just as well as an m-series
 
  #27  
Old 12-21-2008, 12:04 PM
Marty's Avatar
HCF Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South Central
Posts: 8,519
Default

Originally Posted by reaper2022
And I'm sure cadillac's 4,250-lb behemoth of a car handles just as well as an m-series

Actually better

Cadillac? Are You Serious?
Finally, it was the Cadillac's turn. Could it put it all together, or would the CTS-V prove to be a paper tiger?
As with the M5, the CTS-V's first hot lap was timed with the suspension in its firmest setting, but subsequent quicker laps were turned in the softer mode. And though the six-speed automatic has a manual mode, we found both up- and downshifts too slow to arrive and too upsetting to the chassis when they did. As former GM test-driver John Heinricy has advocated, the car's best performance came in automatic mode.
The CTS-V felt almost as if it was loafing around the track. (Not because we felt comfortable — to the contrary, the driver seat was about as supportive as a beach chair.) The supercharged V8 never sounded like it was working hard, the suspension was so good at soaking up bumps that the track felt smoother, and the transmission did all the thinking so we only had to gas-brake-turn, gas-brake-turn, and so on.
And because the maximum-strength CTS has the brakes to match its power, the Caddy flew through the speed trap at a crushing 107.5 mph and stopped on a dime for the approaching corner. Initially we weren't persuaded we had cut a very quick lap, but the downloaded data proved that the Cadillac had recorded a best of 1:29.24, some 0.29 second quicker than the Mercedes and 1.1 seconds quicker than the BMW.
Plus the Caddy is some $30,000 cheaper. Also as a side note the CTS is not in the same segment as the M5 because of price alone. The CTS IMO is in a Audi type of segment even though it undercuts the car that it would compete against there also (RS4) by around $22,000 or $23,000.
 
  #28  
Old 12-21-2008, 02:18 PM
reaper2022's Avatar
Super Cereal Admin
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 7,081
Default

I stand corrected. I'd still take the m5 (actually, I'd take an m3, but that's just me) over the cadillac. The cts-v looks a little too much like an m1a1 abrams to me. That, and as amazing as factory-blown cars are, it just tells me that the manufacturer didn't feel like engineering a better N/A engine, so they just threw a supercharger on it and called it good. I'm sure that's not actually the case, but it's what I get out of it
 
  #29  
Old 12-21-2008, 03:50 PM
Marty's Avatar
HCF Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South Central
Posts: 8,519
Default

A better n/a engine? It has the same engine as the ZR-1 in it with a slightly smaller blower. LS7? do you not think that is an amazing feat of developement? Ti. pushrods/valves/springs, hand built, and making 505hp while still able to obtain 26 to 28mpg on the highway. I'm sorry but GM makes the absolute best engines out of the big three as far as V8's go. They also have a fantastic example of a really nice V6(direct injection 3.6's in the base CTS and upcoming camaro with 305hp and 280tq)

Ford has to throw a supercharger on anything to make power with it and Dodge's biggest baddest production V8 falls 80hp short of the N/A LS7.
 
  #30  
Old 12-21-2008, 04:08 PM
reaper2022's Avatar
Super Cereal Admin
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 7,081
Default

Originally Posted by reaper2022
I'm sure that's not actually the case, but it's what I get out of it
I didn't say it wasn't a good engine, I just said I don't like factory-blown/boosted cars (and yes, that includes terminator cobras)
 


Quick Reply: If you had the money....



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:30 AM.