350z
#11
07-27-2005 | 12:15 PM
Administrator - Formerly 90Civtegra
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,549
From: Glen Burnie, Maryland
RE: 350z
ORIGINAL: andryuha
who cares, WRX is ugly and has a turbo. 350Z has neither of these characteristics
who cares, WRX is ugly and has a turbo. 350Z has neither of these characteristics
I care and its all a matter of opinion. I happen to think the WRX looks good. I also think its pretty nice for a WRX station wagon which is non STi beat a 350z by 3 car lengths. I know the 350z at least exhaust because I could see it but it may or may not been the only mod.
Not here to start argument or debate like I said its all matter of opinion!
#12
07-27-2005 | 12:30 PM
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 430
From:
RE: 350z
ORIGINAL: 90Civtegra
I care and its all a matter of opinion. I happen to think the WRX looks good. I also think its pretty nice for a WRX station wagon which is non STi beat a 350z by 3 car lengths. I know the 350z at least exhaust because I could see it but it may or may not been the only mod.
Not here to start argument or debate like I said its all matter of opinion!
ORIGINAL: andryuha
who cares, WRX is ugly and has a turbo. 350Z has neither of these characteristics
who cares, WRX is ugly and has a turbo. 350Z has neither of these characteristics
I care and its all a matter of opinion. I happen to think the WRX looks good. I also think its pretty nice for a WRX station wagon which is non STi beat a 350z by 3 car lengths. I know the 350z at least exhaust because I could see it but it may or may not been the only mod.
Not here to start argument or debate like I said its all matter of opinion!
I have to agry with andryuha here, I always thought the wrx is a super 4clynider super car, but after closer inspection the only reson is b/c of a turbo. the 350z produces even more power without a turbo.
#13
07-27-2005 | 12:33 PM
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 430
From:
RE: 350z
o i have test driven the new mustang great car, but after driving the 350z , i think my obvious choice is the 350z (plus I dont want a car the explodes from the cruise control switch) aka a Ford "built tough". dont get me wrong the new mustang is great.
#14
07-27-2005 | 01:13 PM
Administrator - Formerly 90Civtegra
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,549
From: Glen Burnie, Maryland
RE: 350z
ORIGINAL: carlover
I have to agry with andryuha here, I always thought the wrx is a super 4clynider super car, but after closer inspection the only reson is b/c of a turbo. the 350z produces even more power without a turbo.
I have to agry with andryuha here, I always thought the wrx is a super 4clynider super car, but after closer inspection the only reson is b/c of a turbo. the 350z produces even more power without a turbo.
what dont you guys understand that is my point! I'm not saying the 350z is a better car and I'm not saying the WRX is a better car, I'm saying my buddie pulled hard core on a 350Z in a WRX that is my only point! I'm just trying to boost about my buddies boost!!! lol
The 350z is a great car and I think the WRX is also IMO.
#17
07-27-2005 | 02:24 PM
HCF Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,702
From:
RE: 350z
ORIGINAL: Forty04
What dealership lets a 17 year old take a 350Z for an hour?? Cause i'm 22, and i'll gladly go take an hour long rip on that thing
What dealership lets a 17 year old take a 350Z for an hour?? Cause i'm 22, and i'll gladly go take an hour long rip on that thing
ive never driven an S2000, ridden in one tho.
#18
07-27-2005 | 08:12 PM
HCF Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,607
From: San Diego
RE: 350z
Power power power. That's all that can be said here? The 350Z is, yes an amazing powerhouse with it's 6 cyl engine, but is also a crazy driving machine. The car had something like 18 patents submitted for its suspension system. While driving my friend's, I took a 90 degree corner at 45 mph and it was gripping like no other. That's why the 350Z is a better car than the Mustang IMO. Two less cyclinders, and it will still keep up on the track. Although I've never driven an S2000, I've sat in one and I'd have to take the 350Z over it because of the space.
#19
07-27-2005 | 09:21 PM
HCF Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,313
From:
RE: 350z
ORIGINAL: Nail I3unny
look at the gear ratios and the torque...still think the mustangs a better car? the 350Z is more expensive for a reason
PLUS there is far mor aftermarket support for the Z, you can get a twin turbo kit for 6k [8D]
look at the gear ratios and the torque...still think the mustangs a better car? the 350Z is more expensive for a reason
PLUS there is far mor aftermarket support for the Z, you can get a twin turbo kit for 6k [8D]
When I went to AutoX 2 weeks ago there was a new Mustang and a new 350 and the Mustang pwnd that Z. It may have been the driver though, but that's just what I saw.
#20
07-27-2005 | 10:32 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,639
From: Parma, OH
RE: 350z
I wouldn't be caught dead driving a ford, unless it's a 70s stang, plus 350Z is leaps and bounds ahead of mustang in the design department. LOL, i just remembered a funny incident. At last year's auto show, there were two rednecks (one had a ford racing shirt) walking by a Mini display, and one of them said "pfft, them minis are like BMWs, they will fall apart in a few months. I was just cracking up