B16A2 vs. B16A1
#12
RE: B16A2 vs. B16A1
Sure they're the bottom of the barrel as far as B seriesDOHC VTEC engines are concerned, but they don't suck. Opinions are opinions though, I suppose.
I don't agree with yours as you don't agree with his, but I'm not opposed to you having the opinion.
I don't agree with yours as you don't agree with his, but I'm not opposed to you having the opinion.
#13
RE: B16A2 vs. B16A1
I just dont see why people go bonkers over a 1.6 liter engine with next to no tq. I mean a B18B swap will cost so much less and actually perform as good if not better than a B16 swap. I know people with EM1's with bolt ons that run about mid 15's. That is a normal time. My buddy has a 94 Integra that is around 300lbs heavier than the civic, and he is by no means a little guy(225ish lbs) with nothing done to it but bolt ons and a aftermarket clutch and he is running high 14's at 96mph.
#14
RE: B16A2 vs. B16A1
ORIGINAL: Marty
I know people with EM1's with bolt ons that run about mid 15's. That is a normal time.
I know people with EM1's with bolt ons that run about mid 15's. That is a normal time.
Anywho, the b16 is an affordable engine which nets you 20-30 extra hp over that of any D series it's being swapped with. It still has potential.
It may not have the potential of a b18c, but those .2L of displacement don't make that much of a difference IMO.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Captain_Sl0w
Engine & Internal
2
10-04-2008 04:05 AM